Skip to content
EOI Insights
Guides
See live numbers

Deeper look

Drill-Down — one occupation, any published dimension

Most of the specialised views in this product are a fixed slice of the same data. Drill-Down is the general case: pick one occupation and split its pool by whichever published dimension the question needs.

Not migration advice. Every extra split makes counts smaller, and smaller counts are more often estimated. Precision falls as detail rises.
Illustrative split, not live counts.

What this view measures

One occupation on one subclass, with its pool broken along the dimension you select: points, nominated state, submission month, English, partner skills, Australian study or status.

Reading the chart

Read the labelled estimates carefully. In fine splits most cells fall under 20, so the visible bars are a mix of published figures and reconstructed ones, and the view marks which is which.

Totals always reconcile to the published number, even when the internal split is partly estimated. Quote the total with confidence and the split with care.

What the figure represents

This is the view for a specific question rather than a general browse. If you already know which dimension you care about, this gets there faster than the specialised charts.

In the dashboard

Select exactly one occupation, set the visa, then choose the dimension. Changing the dimension is cheap, so try two or three before settling on a reading.

Drill-Down is behind sign in. Occupation Trends is open in the guest trial.

Drill-Down is behind sign in. Occupation Trends for 189 and 190 plus five occupations is open in the guest trial.

For applicants

Useful once you have a specific question. If you are still orienting, Occupation Trends and Queue by Points answer the common ones with less risk of over-reading.

For migration professionals

The view to open when a client asks something the standard charts do not cover. State the estimated share before you interpret any bar.

Limits of this view

Only dimensions the government publishes are available, splits below 20 are reconstructed, and no combination of dimensions reveals anything about invitations.

Common questions

Why do the estimated parts look different from the published ones?

They are deliberately marked so you can tell them apart. Published figures are exact; estimated portions are reconstructed from the known total.